"Now, it is clear that the decline of a language must ultimately have political and economic causes: it is not due simply to the bad influence of this or that individual writer." -George Orwell, "Politics and the English Language"
As I finished reading and annotating George Orwell's "Politics and the English Language", I really caught myself thinking about this particular part of this essay. Without any doubt, there are numerous major causes towards the downfall of the English Language; Orwell stated so himself. But everyone has different opinions as to what the leading cause of our declining language really is. Orwell validates that the English language is falling apart mainly due to politics and economics. I agree with Orwell, but simultaneously contradict his idea. While I also believe that political and economic causes have affected our language, I feel that there is another factor out there that has negatively impacted our language; a trend that is convenient yet unprofessional... texting. Just about every teenager and adult in our country has access to texting. It is what one would call 'hip' or 'cool'. But is texting really 'cool' in the long run?
People have become addicted to texting. Some teenagers sneak their cell phones with them to the dinner table, and text under the table when their parents aren't looking. Employees might sneak into the bathroom and text on the job. Better yet, I have seen people text at church! Everyone loves texting- well, maybe not everyone. My dad, for example, once said, "What's the point of texting when you have a phone that you can actually talk on?" I completely agree with my dad. Even though texting may be convenient and easy, or even fun, it is a trend that makes some people look lazy and unprofessional, which challenges Orwell's point that "[the downfall of a language] is not due simply to the bad influence of this or that individual writer." This statement is partially inaccurate. The way one individual writes may have an impact on the way someone else writes. If someone uses shorthand ("The Texting Language") writing, someone else might do the same. At the moment, texting may seem to be a convenience. However, if a teacher asks a student to write an essay, that student might write using "The Texting Language". That would most likely result in a failing grade. Using "u" for "You" or "l8r" for "Later" looks ridiculous in several cases.
To finalize my argument, texting isn't helpful towards the English language in the long run. So the next time you are about to text someone, try calling them instead. You will impress them!
Sunday, July 4, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I doubt anyone of us here would dream of using "u" instead of "you" in an essay.
ReplyDeleteIt's more of a choice we make. We chose to use this "Texting Language" when the situation does not call for formality. We abandon all the rules that govern writing, for there is no penalty for doing so. Our friends aren't grading us on spelling or vocabulary(at least not mine), so why make an effort to be formal or correct? I hope most people are able to know when the use of this "Texting Language" is, I dare say, appropriate.
I agree with Raul on this one. Our school and social lives are two separate things. The point of a text is to get the point across to the other person quickly and in less than 160 characters. Besides, after being in school for about 7 hours, we are mentally drained and it is much easier to type "u" than "you". However, I cannot remember a time where I have ever used texting slang in an essay or any type of formal writing. When you are writing an essay, you have to be in a certain frame of mind and you have to be focused. The only way you would make a mistake such as writing "u" instead of "you" would be if you were distracted or not paying attention. Orwell is right in a sense, but he is in no way completely right. The times have changed and if you are giving your full attention to an essay and you proofread it, you are more likely to catch such errors. Texting may result in carpal tunnel, but I do not believe it affects the English language.
ReplyDeleteRaul, you brought up a good point; that texting is a choice. However, the subject that I was trying to bring to mind is whether or not texting will affect the English language in the long run- in the future. Will people 'abandon' our formal way of writing, and just adapt to the "Texting Language"? I think it is possible. I mean, of course no one wants to use abbreviations in an essay, or a job application, where it really counts on how we write. But one could develop this habit of texting, and use it unexpectedly.
ReplyDeleteOrwell should know well about the collapsing of the English language: the compressed language "Newspeak" is deeply fixed into his novel 1984.
ReplyDeleteI partially agree with Charles and Raul; though I doubt texting does not have an effect on the English language. I agree with Joey, since it all begins as a habit. However, I believe that it is only a matter of time before a laugh is replaced by “LOL” and romantic language is swapped for a “I <3 U”.
Texting is an oversimplified, emotionless language, which in my opinion, is worse than Orwell's future of over-ambiguous writing.
I agree that texting is no more than an "oversimplified, emotionless language" that many of us have acquired as a horrible habit. Like the English language, the "texting language" has become universal among texters, especially teenagers. Using myself as an example, I use the "texting language" on Facebook, Myspace, Twitter, etc. because it is such a convenient language to use to transmit messages in seconds. I use the grammar-less texting language almost every day, and I have to admit it has affected my English language in that I have developed incorrect grammar and even spelling. It may also be the reason why I sometimes struggle to write essays because I seldom use a formal and grammatically correct language outside of school.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Charles that our school and social lives are two separate things. However, what we do in one of them affects what we do on the other even if we don't realize it. We may try to use a formal language when we text, but we all know that would be silly to do so.
Personally I do not text with the "hippest lingo" or whatever you call it. If you know me, you know I am not a texter (and I know that irks you people when I never text you back, but how do I respond to 'LOL!'???) I favor long, spelled out, correctly spelled texts because I appreciate a complete thought and I value your opinions more. But shortening of words where a long version of the word is unnecessary becomes necessary. I see and have nothing against shorter English; things like: I like you; rather than: My love for you longs and burns like a billion suns, my loins are flaming and I just wanted to tell you that you are the world to me--are shorter and more convenient in a text, but I'd rather hear the second (longer) version in person you know? Not just "I Like You." Joey, I couldn't have made this topic any better than you have, it makes so much sense. Texting is no better than watching Television; entertainment. Give your thumbs a rest if your going to say "I Love You", just give them a call instead and save texting for something nonchalant and reminding.
ReplyDelete